Gaurav Pratap Chauhan @ Gaurav Raj Chauhan @ Gaurav Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.31572 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -181 Year- 2018 Thana -CHAPRA TOWN District- SARAN ====================================================== Gaurav Pratap Chauhan @ Gaurav Raj Chauhan @ Gaurav Chauhan, Son of Manoj Kumar, Resident of Village- Basantpur, P.S.- Panapur, Distt.- Saran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Chapra Town P.S. Case No.181 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the F.I.R., three unknown miscreants came at the petrol pump and took petrol worth Rs.700/- and on demand of payment one of the miscreants started fleeing away by motorcycle. A fire was also made by one of the miscreants but it did not hit the informant. One of them was caught by staff of the petrol pump.
It has been submitted that this petitioner has no concern with the other accused, who allegedly shot fire. Nothing
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31572 of 2018 (3) dt.11-07-2018 incriminating material has been recovered from his possession on the date occurrence. He is in custody since 10.04.2018 having clean antecedent.
The learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the submission.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of bail is allowed. The petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Town P.S. Case No.181 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) If the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of allegation, the prosecution will have liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail. (Sanjay Kumar, J) U Harish/-