Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16264 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-723 Year-2021 Thana- KHAGARIA District- Khagaria ====================================================== RAHUL KUMAR Son of Late Satish Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Rampur Mukund , P.s.- Vishambharpur, Distt.- Gopalganj.Rahimpur Pachkhutti, P.s.- Khagaria (Mufassil), Distt.- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 01-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, as pointed out by the office be removed within four weeks.

The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Khagaria (Muffassil) P.S. Case No. 723 of 2021 for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation in the FIR is that the accused persons firstly came to his home and asked about his whereabouts and when it was informed that he is not at home they threatened and said that let the son be killed and then tried to drag him towards the river and also beat him but anyhow he ran away, went to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16264 of 2022(3) dt.01-08-2022 2/2 doctor, took some injections for the injuries and came home. It is further alleged that once again they came along with the other accused persons in the afternoon armed with iron rod and started assaulting the informant's son indiscriminately causing serious injuries to him. When his daughter came to his rescue, it is alleged that she was also assaulted causing another serious injury to her too.

In this case, case diary was called for and the injury reports are part of the said case diary. According to the report, the injuries attributed to both the brother and sister have been opined to be serious in nature.

Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is not inclined to grant him the privilege of bail which is accordingly rejected.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Jagdish/- U T