Ali Hasan Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.39455 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -45 Year- 2016 Thana -AKHODHIGOLA District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Ali Hasan Ansari, son of Late Guljar Ansari, R/o Village- Budhuan, P.O.- Chap, P.S.- Akorhigola, District- Rohtas.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 29 of 2017, arising out of Akorhigola P.S. Case No. 45 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of dowry death and petitioner is husband of deceased.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has falsely been implicated in this case and, as a matter of fact, she died due to burn injury as her sari caught fire while cooking food. Further submission is that he is in custody for one year and charge has been framed on 25.5.2017 and not a single witness has been examined in this case.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39455 of 2017 (3) dt.12-09-2017 2/2 Heard learned APP and learned counsel for the informant, who have opposed the prayer for bail. Having heard both sides and in view of facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. However, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of nine months. At the same time, Superintendent of Police, Rohtas is also directed to ensure the presence of witnesses in court.
With the above observation, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U