← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/975/2020allowed

Md. Najish @ Jishan Khamar v. The State Of Bihar

2021-02-12Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.975 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-193 Year-2017 Thana- KURTHA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== MD. NAJISH @ JISHAN KHAMAR Son of Zarif Ahmad Resident of Village- Pijranwan, P.S.- Kurtha, District- Arwal. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Binay Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mrs.Usha Kumari 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-02-2021 Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned APP for the State.

The matter relates to grant of anticipatory bail to the appellant in connection with a case registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The prosecution case, in short is that the accused persons including the appellant assaulted the informant and his father with lathi, danda, due to which they sustained injuries and they also abused the informant.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.975 of 2020(3) dt.12-02-2021 2/3 It has been submitted on behalf of the appellant that the appellant has got no criminal antecedent and there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the appellant. The appellant has falsely been implicated in the present case. The alleged occurrence is said to have taken place on 03.12.2017 and the case was instituted on 05.12.2017. Delay has not been explained by the prosecution. For a petty reason the alleged occurrence is said to have taken place. The alleged occurrence has not taken place within public view. Hence no offence under the SC/ST Act is attracted in the present case. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the appellant is named in the F.I.R.

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the order dated 05.02.2020, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge 1st, Jehanabad vide A.B.P. No.66 of 2020 in connection with Special SC/ST case No.194 of 2017 arising out of Kurtha P.S. case No.193 of 2017, is set aside. The criminal appeal is allowed.

Accordingly, the appellant, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.975 of 2020(3) dt.12-02-2021 3/3 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge 1st, Jehanabad in connection with Special SC/ST case No.194 of 2017 arising out of Kurtha P.S. case No.193 of 2017.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T