Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43102/2017rejected

Sudama Yadav @ Sudama Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-20Mr. Justice Arun Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43102 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -67 Year- 2017 Thana -NASRIGANJ District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Sudama Yadav @ Sudama Singh, son of Dudhnath Singh @ Dudhnath Yadav, resident of village- Husainabad, P.S.- Nasriganj (Rajpur), DistrictRohtas (Sasaram) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chhote Lal Mishra, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr. Ajay Kumar-1, A.P.P.

For the informant :

Mr. A.N.Rai, Advocate.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-09-2017 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Nasriganj (Rajpur) P.S.Case No. 67 of 2017 registered under Sections 384, 385, 386, 395, 307/34 of the Indian penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegation in brief is that this petitioner along with 10 other persons came to the construction site where construction was going on for godown by the Bihar State Building Construction Corporation Ltd. at the direction of the Court but he objected the construction and demanding extortion amount from his mobile and reaching at the spot opened fire upon the labourers. Submission is that there is land dispute relating to the land with the petitioner and there is no any specific allegation against

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43102 of 2017 (2) dt.20-09-2017 2/2 him of making demand of extortion or firing.

Learned counsel for the informant submits that this petitioner has got more than a dozen of cases against him and he has criminal antecedent of serious nature.

Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in particular, criminal antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected at this stage. However, the trial court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial within a year and if it is not concluded, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

(Arun Kumar, J) Sujit/- U T