Raghunandan Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15077 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2025 Thana- SARMERA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Raghunandan Choudhary S/O Shailendra Choudhary R/O Vill.- Jahagirpur, P.S.- Sarmera, Dist.- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sarmera P.S. Case No. 06 of 2025 dated 15.01.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109(1), 303(2), 351 and 352 of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that the petitioner and the co-accused persons entered the house of the informant and started abusing and assaulting them with lathi, danda, iron rod etc. It is further alleged that the petitioner assaulted the informant's son on his leg due to which his leg got fractured. It is further alleged that the co-accused, Nisha Devi, Gudiya Devi and Sunita Devi snatched the golden ornaments of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15077 of 2025(3) dt.27-03-2025 2/2 the informant and his family members.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is case and counter case between both the parties. It is further submitted that the injury sustained by the injured is grievous in nature which is non-vital part of the body. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 17.01.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Nalanda, Bihar Sharif in connection with Sarmera P.S. Case No. 06 of 2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) shivam/- U T