← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5096/2019withdrawn

Pankaj Kumar Tiwary @ Pankaj Kumar Tiwari And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-09-23Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5096 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.

Pankaj Kumar Tiwary @ Pankaj Kumar Tiwari and Ors Son of Sri Rameshwar Tiwary Resident of Village-Ramnagar, Andarshala, Ward No.5, P.S.-Siwan, District-Siwan.

2.

Amarjeet Kumar Gupta Son of Shri Hira Lal Sao Resident of VillageChakri, P.O.-Nandpur, Amwari, P.S.-Raghunathpur, District-Siwan. 3.

Avinash Kumar Son of Shri Laldeo Ram Resident of Village-Nainijor, P.O.- Bakulari, P.S.-Guthani, District-Siwan.

4.

Meera Gupta Wife of Shri Kamleshwar Prasad Gupta Resident of Village, P.O. and P.S.-Guthani, District-Siwan.

5.

Manoj Kumar Barnwal Son of Shri Pashupati Nath Barnwal Resident of Village, P.O. and P.S.-Guthani, District-Siwan. 6.

Chandra Prakash Vishwakarma Son of Shri Amardeo Vishwakarma Resident of Village-Kharauli, P.S.-Guthani, District-Siwan. 7.

Krishna Mohan Patel Sonof Dharmdeo Prasad Resident of village, P.O. and P.S.-Guthani, District-Siwan.

8.

Vineeta Singh D/o Sheo Shankar Singh Resident of village-Hathauri, P.O. and P.S.-Darauli, District-Siwan.

9.

Saroj Kumari Wife of Manish Kumar Sharma Resident of village, P.O.- Nautan, P.S.-Nautan, District-Siwan.

10.

Vinod Chaudhary Son of Shri Ramdeo Chaudhary Resident of Village and P.O.-Vilaspur, P.S.-Mairwa, District-Siwan.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Education Officer, Siwan.

3.

The District Programme Officer, (Establishment), Siwan. 4.

The Prakhand Pramukh-cum-the Chairman of Block Teacher Employment Committee, Block-Mairwa, District-Siwan.

5.

The Block Development Officer-cum- the Member Secretary Block Teacher, Employment Committee, Block-Mairwa, District-Siwan. 6.

The Block Education Officer, Mairwa, District-Siwan. 7.

The State Appellate Authority, Education Department, Bihar, Patna. 8.

Nebu Kumar Yadav Son of Shri Dudhnath Yadav Resident of VillageDumrahar Khurd, P.S.-Darauli, District-Siwan. 9.

Jasila Kumari @ Kumari Jasila Kumari Wife of Shri Ramashankar Singh Resident of Village-Mairwa Road, P.S.-Mairwa, District-Siwan. 10.

Manjesh Kumar Singh Son of Shri Surendra Singh Resident of VillageBadgaon Tola, (Harwaran Rai), P.O. and P.S.-Mairwa, District-Siwan. 11.

Uma Devi Wife of Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh Resident of Mohalla-Main Road, Mairwa, P.O. and P.S.-Mairwa, District-Siwan.

Patna High Court CWJC No.5096 of 2019(9) dt.23-09-2025 2/2 12.

Kumari Premlata D/o Bidya Ram Resident of Village-Sishani Kakarghati, P.S.-Ziradei, District-Siwan.

13.

Sakeena Khatoon D/o Imam Khatoon Resident of Village-Makdoom Sarai, P.S.-Siwan, District-Siwan.

14.

Dileep Kumar Gupta Son of Shri Vishwanath Prasad Gupta Resident of Village-Sheopur Mathia, Main Road, Mairwa, P.S.-Mairwa, District-Siwan. 15.

Kiran Kushwaha Wife of Shri Deo Prasad Singh Resident of VillageKavilsawan, P.O.-Pachphera, P.S.-Mirganj, District-Gopalganj. 16.

Nijamuddin Ansari Son of Shri Munavwar Ali Resident of VillageBabhnauli, P.O.-Langarpura, P.S-Mairwa, District-Siwan. 17.

Rita Jaiswal Wife of Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Resident of Mohalla-Thana Road Mairwa, P.S.-Mairwa, District-Siwan.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Satyam Shivam Sundaram, Advocate Mr. Ankit, Advocate Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents :

Mr. Jitendra Kr. Roy 1, SC-13 Mr. Umesh Kr. Mishra, Advocate Mr. Hitesh Suman, AC to SC-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-09-2025 Counsel for the petitioners, counsel for the private respondent nos. 8 to 17 and counsel for the State are present.

2. Counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the grievance of the petitioners has been redressed. As such, the counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the present writ petition.

3. Permission, as prayed for, is accorded.

4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Ajit Kumar, J) Shahnawaz/- U