Shatrohan Rai @ Satrudhan Rai @ Chunnu Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17194 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2019 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== SHATROHAN RAI @ SATRUDHAN RAI @ CHUNNU RAI, Son of Late Ramnath Rai, Resident of Village - Sandha, P.S. - Chapra Muffasil, Dist. - Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Tej Pratap Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-05-2020 This matter is taken up through video conferencing. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273/34 of the India Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Recovery of liquor is alleged from the river side. Petitioner was not there at the time of recovery. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Petitioner is in custody since 16.11.2019.

Considering the facts aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17194 of 2020(2) dt.13-05-2020 2/2 like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Excise Trial No. 635 of 2019 arising out of Chapra Muffasil Police Station Case No. 115 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:- (a) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (b) Both the bailors shall be resident of the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.

If the petitioner would not be able to furnish sureties due to lock-down, he shall be provisionally released on his personal bond and the provisional bail shall be confirmed only after production of the bailors within fifteen days of restoration of normal function of the Court.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T