The Bihar State Cooperative Bank Ltd. And ANR v. Sri Vijaya Sahkari Grih Nirman Samiti Patna And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1629 of 2015 In C. REV. 324 of 2012 ======================================================

1. The Bihar State Cooperative Bank Ltd. Ashok Raj Path, Patna through tis Managing Director.

2. The Managing Director, Bihar State co-operative Bank, Ashok Raj Path, Patna.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. Sri Vijaya Sahkari Grih Nirman Samiti Patna having its registered office in mohalla Punaichak, P.S. - Shastri Nagar, District Patna through its Secretary Sri Chandrabhushan Singh.

2. Chandrabhushan Singh, S/o Sri Vikramaditiya Singh, resident of mohalla Punaichak, P.S. Shastri Nagar, District - Patna.

3. Ganpati Singh, S/o Sri Shivpujan Singh, resident of mohalla Punaichak, P.S. - Shastri Nagar, District - Patna.

4. The State of Bihar.

5. Registrar Co-operative Societies, Co-operative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

6. Bihar State Housing Co-operative federation, through its Managing Director, Lalit Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna.

7. The Collector Patna, District Patna.

8. Housing and Urban Development Coporation, having its registered office at HUDCOhouse, Lodhi Road, New Delhi throughits Development Officer, Jainatpur Kothi Bank Road, Patna. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Namrata Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) 15-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsels for the respondent nos.1,2 and 3 and for the respondent no.8.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners

Patna High Court MJC No.1629 of 2015 (3) dt.15-02-2016 2/2 that the Interlocutory Application which was filed for condonation of delay in filing the Review Application, was not required to be filed in the Civil Review No.324 of 2012 as according to Stamp Report there was no question of delay. Hence in the present restoration application, the prayer has only been made for restoration of Civil Review No.324 of 2012 to its original file. In the circumstances, Civil Review No.324 of 2012 is directed to be restored to its original file, subject to the petitioner complying with the second part of the order dated 16.07.2014 passed in civil review application with regard to filing of the requisites in review petition within a period of one week from today.

(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) (Sudhir Singh, J) B.Kr./-Sudip U