Bablu Yadav @ Bablu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18146 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1197 Year-2023 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== Bablu Yadav @ Bablu Kumar Son of Kailu Yadav @ Kail Yadav Resident of Village- Kaiya, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-03-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Muffasil (Gaya) P.S. Case No. 1197 of 2023, for allegedly having committed offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC.
3. As per the prosecution case, all the named accused persons came to the house of the informant where coaccused Umesh Yadav assaulted the informant with a sharp cutting weapon as a result thereof, the informant sustained injuries on his right hand and thereafter, on hulla, the agnate of the informant came, upon which the petitioner is said to have assaulted the agnate of the informant, namely Sanjay Yadav with the butt of the pistol, due to which he sustained injuries on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18146 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026 2/3 his head.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence. The petitioner and the informant are own gotiyas and there is a land dispute in between the parties, due to which the present first information report has been lodged. The injuries are found to be simple in nature, however the same have not been mentioned in the impugned order. Other co-accused persons have been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.04.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 23893 of 2024 and vide order dated 07.08.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 50695 of 2024. The petitioner is having four criminal antecedents in which he is on bail.
5. The learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner is a habitual offender and is an accused in four more cases.
6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner and the informant are own gotiyas, there is a land dispute in between the parties and the other co-accused persons have been enlarged on bail a the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, let the petitioner, above
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18146 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026 3/3 named, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gayaji in connection with Muffasil (Gaya) P.S. Case No. 1197 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., with further condition:
(1) The learned Court concerned shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court concerned shall take steps for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification. (Ritesh Kumar, J) AjayMishra/- U T