Bhurhia Mahiyama Pacs Sanhaula, Bhagalpur Through Its Chairman Namely Daya Shankar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.828 of 2019 In Letters Patent Appeal No.903 of 2016 ====================================================== Bhurhia Mahiyama PACS Sanhaula, Bhagalpur through its Chairman namely Daya Shankar Mishra aged about 56 years Male, Son of Late Parmanand Mishra, resident of Village Vishwashpur, Police Station Sanhaula, DistrictBhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Shri Pranav Kumar, District Magistrate, Bhagalpur. 3.
Shri Gulab Kassain, the District Manager, Bhagalpur (Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.).
4.
Shri Anil Kumar Gupta, District Co-operative Officer, Bhagalpur. 5.
Shri Vikramaditya Singh, Block Co-operative Officer, Sanhaula, during. 6.
Shri Subhash Kumar, Managing Director, Cooperative Bank Limited, Bhagalpur, District- Bhagalpur.
7.
The Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Bihar, Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. S. Raza Ahmad, A.A.G. 5 Md. Kamil Akhtar, A.C. to A.A.G. 5 Mr. Alok Ranjan, Advocate For B.S.F.C.
:
Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Utkarsh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 04-03-2020 Learned counsel for the Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. states that the judgement dated 29.01.2016 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 13477 of 2015 (titled as Bharhiya Mahiyama PACS Sanhaula Vs. The State of Bihar) by
Patna High Court MJC No.828 of 2019(3) dt.04-03-2020 2/2 learned Single Judge, is now subject matter of challenge before the Apex Court in which, Hon'ble the Apex Court has called for the report vide order dated 09.01.2020.
In view of the same, we deem it prudent not to proceed with the matter.
As such, the application is disposed off reserving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition on the same and subsequent cause of action as and when need so arises. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) uma/- U