Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19716/2024dismissed

Gholat Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-08Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19716 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2023 Thana- BAKHARI District- Begusarai ====================================================== GHOLAT SAHNI SON OF LATE RAM SUNDAR SAHNI R/O-NAGAR PARISHAD BAKHRI WARD NO. 12 (GODHIYARI), P.S.-BAKHRI DISTT.-BEGUSARAI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar For the Informant :

Mr.Arjun Pd.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 08-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bakhri P.S. Case No.208 of 2023, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted the informant on his head by means of iron rod due to which he sustained injuries.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19716 of 2024(3) dt.08-05-2024 2/2 omnibus in nature. There is no specific overt act against the petitioner. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail by submitting that there is specific allegation against the petitioner to assault the informant due to which he sustained grievous injury.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as considering the nature of injury, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.

7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T