← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20491/2023allowed

Chawni Singh @ Sumit Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-06-28Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20491 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2022 Thana- HUSSAINGANJ District- Siwan ====================================================== CHAWNI SINGH @ SUMIT SINGH SON OF SRI UDAY PRATAP SINGH R/O VILLAGE- NARAIBANDH IMILIYA, P.S.- MAU, DISTT.- MAU (U.P.) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kanchan Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 28-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 302, 120(B), 307 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 27 of the Arms Act. As per allegation in the FIR, informant is a candidate of MLA election and he was going to his parental home by his endeavour car and his followers were by another vehicles. In the meantime, inside the scorpio, some people started firing as a result of which Binod Yadav died and one got injured. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to political rivalry. Nothing has been recovered from his conscious

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20491 of 2023(3) dt.28-06-2023 2/2 possession. No consistent material has been found against the petitioner during investigation. Similarly situated other accused person has already been enlarged on bail by another coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 26.6.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 2237 of 2023. Petitioner is in custody since 23.12.2022.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM IX, Siwan in connection with Hussainganj P.S. Case No. 92 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U