Krishna Ballabh Sharma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.644 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6450 of 2011 ======================================================
1. Krishna Ballabh Sharma Son of Late Shyam Sharan Singh Resident of Village - Mahmadpur (Kishunpur), P.S. - Makhdumpur, Distt. - Jehanabad .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. State o f Bihar through Chief Secretary Old Secretariat, Patna - 15
2. Mr. Sudhir Kumar , The Principal Secretary, Finance Deptt., Govt. Of Bihar Old Secretariat, Patna - 15
3. Mr. Vijay Prakash , the Agriculture Production Commission - Cum - Principal Secretary Agriculture Deptt., Vikas Bhawan (New Secretariat), Patna - 15
4. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Agrawal, the District Magistrate, Gaya
5. Mr. Maqsud Alam , Sub- Divisional Officer, Sadar, Gaya
6. Mr. Vikash Kumar, Block Development Officer, Fetehpur, District Gaya.
7. Mr. Kumar Rakesh, District General Provident Officer, Gaya
8. Mr. Arun Kumar Mishra, Joint Commissioner - Cum - Director General, Provident Fund Bihar , Pant Bhawan, 5th Floor, Bailey Road, Patna
9. Mr. I.S.D. Dhaliwal, Accountant General, Bihar, Beerchnd Patel Path , Patna.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar For the State : Mr. Brajesh Kumar, A.C. to A.A.G.-4 For the Accountant General : Mr. Uday Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State as well as learned counsel for the Accountant General, Bihar.
It appears that now the direction of the Writ Court has been complied with fully and no case of contempt is made out. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no interest has been paid for the delayed payment.
Patna High Court MJC No.644 of 2015 (7) dt.23-02-2018 2/2 Be that as it may, this Court is not inclined to proceed further in the contempt matter.
The application stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to raise his other grievances, if at all, tenable under law. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U