← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1523/2016dismissed

Ram Pravesh Dubey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-06-22Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1523 of 2016 ====================================================== Ram Pravesh Dubey, son of Late Sheo Prasad Dubey, resident of villageShivpur, Post and Police Station-Koragaher, District-Rohtas .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Animesh Kumar Prasar, father's name not known, the District Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram

3. Ajay Kumar Shrivastava, father's name not known, the Circle Officer, Karagahar, District-Rohtas

4. Ramjan Mian, son of Lae Morbi Mian

5. Jokhu Ram

6. Gorakh Ram

7. Ishar Ram

8. Vinod Ram, all sons of Late Bhagwat Ram

9. Sudarshan Ram

10. Sri Bhagwan Ram

11. Mohan Ram, all sons of Late Vivagahan Ram

12. Dadan Ram, son of Khiri Ram

13. Murakut Ram, son of Shiv Gahan Ram

14. Suresh Ram, son of Parshuram Ram All are residents of village-Shivpur, post and police station- Karagahar, District-Rohtas .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar Choubey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 22-06-2016 Heard the parties.

The petitioner complains of non-compliance of the order passed in CWJC No. 1159 of 2014 whereunder this Court taking note of the grievance raised by the petitioner had disposed of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file an application under the provisions of the Bihar Public Encroachment Act after impleading the land encroachers and also demonstrating the extent

Patna High Court MJC No.1523 of 2016 (2) dt.22-06-2016 of encroachment made by them. The counsel for the petitioner relies upon a representation filed present at Annexure-2 to maintain the contempt application.

In my opinion, it is the petitioner who is in contempt for he has failed to abide by the direction. No cause for indulgence is made out.

The application is dismissed.

(Jyoti Saran, J) S.Sb/- U