Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37195/2017bail granted

Guddu Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2017-08-31Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37195 of 2017 (3) dt.31-08-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37195 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -93 Year- 2017 Thana -PATORI District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================

1. Guddu Rai, Son of Sone Lal Rai, Resident of Village- Uttari Dhamoun, P.S.- Patory, District- Samastipur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Narain Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nityanand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-08-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Patory P.S. Case No. 93 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)A/26/35 of the Arms Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of one country made pistol, one cartridge and a knife. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case. Moreover, he has sufficiently been punished for the said offence as he has been in judicial custody since 05.03.2017 and though he has one criminal antecedent but that is of the year 2009 and he is on bail in that case.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37195 of 2017 (3) dt.31-08-2017 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Samastipur, in connection with Patory P.S. Case No. 93 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T