Satyanarayan Prasad Yadav @ Satyanarayan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37318 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -24 Year- 2017 Thana -SAHODARA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Satyanarayan Prasad Yadav @ Satyanarayan Yadav, Son of Late Nepal Yadav, Resident of Village- Mandiha, P.S.- Sahodra, District- West Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Satyavrat Verma Mr. Shashank Chandra, Advocates.

For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 04-102017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 28.06.2017 in connection with Sahodra P.S. Case No. 24 of 2017 for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and in any event the injury by reason of assault attributed to the petitioner on the neck of the informant is simple in nature.

4. A perusal of the injury report, which has been recorded in para-52 of the case diary, discloses that there is abrasion below the neck which is simple in nature.

5. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37318 of 2017 (3) dt.04-102017 satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Sahodra P.S. Case No. 24 of 2017, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/Chandran U T