Raja Ram @ Raja Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18855 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-196 Year-2025 Thana- MASHRAK District- Saran ====================================================== Raja Ram @ Raja Kumar Ram S/O Bachacha Ram R/O Village- Sonauli, P.SMashrakh, Distt.- Saran, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raj Dular Sah, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State, Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that on 06.05.2025 at 11:00 PM, accused persons came and slapped her mother-in-law twice, on objection, accused acted inappropriately with her and took away Rs. 50,000/-, further they also assaulted her son and husband and while fleeing Birbal left his motorcycle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18855 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026 2/2 allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that no specific allegation is alleged against the petitioner and even no motive for the occurrence has been alleged. It is also submitted that petitioner' side and informant are neighbours and they are having dispute relating to passage. It is next submitted that even the injury has been opined to be simple in nature.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Mashrakh P.S. Case No. 196 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS.
7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T