Suraj Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.37638 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -487 Year- 2017 Thana -BAHADURPUR District- DARBHANGA ======================================================
1. Suraj Kumar Mahto S/o Late Bindeshwar Mahto, R/o Vill.- Khja Sarai, P.S.- Bahadur Pur, District- Darbhanga.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md.Ansarul Haque. For the informant : Mr.G.C.Jha, ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-07-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 487 of 2017, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366A, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping of minor daughter of the informant.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the victim girl in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C has disclosed her age 19 years and further stated that she married with the petitioner on her sweet will.
Heard learned A.P.P. and the informant also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37638 of 2018 (3) dt.20-07-2018 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Darbhanga, in Bahadurpur P.S. Case No.487 of 2017, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further conditions are that one of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of court concerned and further condition is that he has to co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the police, otherwise the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) AnilKrSinha/- U