← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/674/2014dismissed

Anupama Bhushan And ANR v. The State Of Bihar Through District Magistrate Senior Superintendent Of Police, Muzaffarpur And ORS

2015-03-10Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.674 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- MUZAFFARPUR ===========================================================

1. 1.Anupama Bhushan

2. 2.Pragya Priya @ Dauly (as per FIR) Both are daughters of Manik Lal Johauri, resident of Johari Kothi, P.S., Town, District-Muzaffarpur, correct parental name and address both are daughters of Late Bhagwan Prasad Poddar, Akharaghat Road, P.S., Town, District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.The State of Bihar through Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur 2.The Dy. Superintendent of Police Town, Muzaffarpur

3. Kanchan Bhaskar, Sub Inspector, investigating officer, P.S., Town, DistrictMuzaffarpur 4.The Circle Officer, Mushari, District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kailash Nath Diwakar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar Sinha, A.C. to S.C.-30 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 10-03-2015 The petitioners are accused in Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case No.599 of 2012 dated 1.11.2012 registered for the offences punishable under sections 406, 420, 467 and 468 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The said police case is under investigation. The instant application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners for issuance of direction to the respondent-authority to verify the documentary evidence which are annexed in the present application. In my view, the application is thoroughly misconceived. To

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.674 of 2014 dt.10-03-2015 2/2 hold investigation into a cognizable offence is the statutory right of the police. Neither the accused nor the informant of a criminal case can dictate the manner in which investigation into a cognizable offence should be made by the police.

In that view of the matter, I find no merit in this application. Accordingly, the application is dismissed.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Md.S./- U T