Ajay Kumar @ Pintu Lal Deo v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34694 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -270 Year- 2015 Thana -BAHERI District- DARBHANGA ====================================================== Ajay Kumar @ Pintu Lal Deo, son of Late Maheshlal Deo, resident of Village - Shivram, P.S. Baheri, District - Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Anisur Rahman, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 02-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 28.12.2015, has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 270 of 2015 having earlier been rejected by order dated 18.10.2016 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 33020 of 2016.

3. It is submitted that in a subsequent development, coaccused Munni Devi and Rishi Jha @ Rishi Kumar Jha @ Reshi Jha @ Reshi Kumar Jha, on whose confessional statement the petitioner was implicated have since been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 19244 of 2016 and Cr. Misc. No. 44993 of 2016 respectively.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Darbhanga in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 270 of 2015 with the following

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34694 of 2017 (2) dt.02-08-2017 2/2 conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/Chandran U T