Arun Yadav @ Arun Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21754 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-315 Year-2019 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani ====================================================== Arun Yadav @ Arun Kumar Yadav S/O- Late Late Lal Yadav R/O- VillageWard No.- 04, Bisahariya, P.S.- Ghoghardiha, Dist.- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Bihar, Patna 2.

Rupa Devi W/O- Arun Yadav @ Arun Kumar Yadav R/O- Village- Belarahi, P.S.- Jhanjharpur, Dist.- Madhubani.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-06-2024 Despite valid service of notice, nobody appears on behalf of the O.P. No. 2.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

3. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 341, 323, 498(A), 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. As per complaint case, all the named accused persons including this petitioner tortured and harassed the complainant for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

5. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner happens to be husband of the complainant and present case has been lodged due to petty family dispute. There is general and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21754 of 2024(3) dt.24-06-2024 2/2 omnibus allegation of commission of assault against him. It is further submitted that petitioner is ready to keep the complainant, as his wife, with full honour and dignity. It is next submitted that the case is triable by the Magistrate. In this connection, petitioner has relied upon a judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Complaint Case No. 315 of 2019, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T