Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42100/2017bail granted

Devendra Kumar Sahni @ Devendra Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.42100 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -182 Year- 2017 Thana -CHIRAIYA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. DEVENDRA KUMAR SAHNI @ DEVENDRA SAHNI son of Rajdeo Sahni, Resident of Village- Chhota Baisha, P.S.- Chakia, District- East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinod Gautam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Chiraiya (Shikarganj) P.S. Case No. 182 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 379, 413, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution case is that police on seeing the petitioner using the ATM machine by inserting different ATM cards one after one another and on seeing the police petitioner started fleeing away and on chase he was arrested and from his possession different ATM cards of different banks were recovered and no explanation was given by him.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he has

sufficiently been punished for the said offence as he has been in judicial custody since 24.06.2017 and has no criminal antecedent. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thosuand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Dhaka, East Champaran, in connection with Chiraiya (Shikarganj) P.S. Case No. 182 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the

prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T