Rabindra Yadav @ Rajendra Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19720 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-222 Year-2018 Thana- CHAUTHAM District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1.

Rabindra Yadav @ Rajendra Yadav, aged 57 years (Male), Son of Shree Narsingh Yadav, Resident of Village - Sonebersa, P.s.- Chautham, Distt. - Khagaria.

2.

Ghoghal @ Pawandeo Yadav, aged 58 years (Male), Son of Shree Narsingh Yadav, Resident of Village - Sonebersa, P.s.- Chautham, Distt. - Khagaria. 3.

Bhujar @ Muzal @ Tejo Yadav, aged 49 years (Male), Son of shree Narsingh Yadav Resident of Village - Sonebersa, P.s.- Chautham, Distt. - Khagaria.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr.Mrityunjay Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Ansar Ul Haque, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners are languishing in custody since 07.01.2019 in a case for the offence registered under Sections 143, 447, 504, 307 of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 17.11.2018 the son of the informant, namely, Tarun Yadav had gone to Rania Bahiyar where co-accused Rinkesh Kumar and Sandip Yadav attacked on him with rifle but anyhow his son saved himself and fled away from there. It is further alleged that if there had not been wall, his son Tarun Yadav would have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19720 of 2019(3) dt.25-04-2019 2/2 sustained firearm injury and mark of firing is evident on the wall.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioners. None is said to have injured in course of occurrence. No offence under Section 307 of the I.P.C. is made out in the present case.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Khagaria, in connection with Choutham P.S. Case No. 222 of 2018, G.R.No. 3260 of 2018.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T