Salauddin Ansari @ Salaudin Ansari @ Salahuddin Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17376 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-386 Year-2025 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== Salauddin Ansari @ Salaudin Ansari @ Salahuddin Ansari Son of Late Muslim Ansari R/o Village - Gopalpur, P.S. - Sherghati,Dist. - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dheeraj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 386 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 20(B)(ii)(b) and 22(B) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that from possession of this petitioner, altogether 80 gm of ganja was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17376 of 2026(2) dt.18-03-2026 2/2 petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and police has not complied Section 105 of the BNSS. It has further been submitted that the alleged recovery of the contraband is much less than small quantity. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 10.09.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Gaya Ji in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 386 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T