Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16198/2023rejected

Vikash Yadav @ Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-10Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16198 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-432 Year-2022 Thana- LAXMIPUR District- Jamui ====================================================== Vikash Yadav @ Vikash Kumar S/O Bharoshi Yadav Resident Of VillageKariwa Pathar, P.S.- Laxmipur, District- Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 10-05-2023 Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within two weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 432 of 2022 dated 01.12.2022 lodged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307 & 504 of the I.P.C. As per the prosecution case, the allegation is there against five named accused persons, against whom general and omnibus allegation is there.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the antecedent of the petitioner is clean and he is in custody since 02.12.2022.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16198 of 2023(2) dt.10-05-2023 2/2 bail.

Learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner don't deserve bail, due to the reason that the fracture occurred at the sensitive part of the body of the informant's son and, therefore, he don't deserve bail.

In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at present and, therefore, the bail petition is hereby rejected.

But liberty is hereby granted to the petitioner that he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. The Trial Court is directed to release petitioner on bail imposing its own conditions, so that he may not evade his appearance during trial.

With this observation, the bail application stands rejected.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) sadique/- U T