Indradev Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5992 of 2019 ====================================================== Indradev Yadav son of Late Dharam Yadav resident of Village- Tetar Bigha, P.S. Rajgir, District- Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar and Ors through the Principal Secretary, Revenue Land Reforms Department, Govt of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Commissioner Patna Division, Patna.
3.
The Collector Nalanda at Bihar Sharif.
4.
The Superintendent of Police Nalanda at Bihar Sharif. 5.
The Sub Divisional Officer, Rajgir Nalanda.
6.
The Dy S P Rajgir Nalanda.
7.
The Circle Officer, Rahui Nalanda.
8.
The SHO Silao Police Station Nalanda.
9.
Rajnandan Yadav son of Late Shivcharan Gope resident of Village- Bahera, PS Silao, District- Nalanda.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjay Prasad For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Md. Khurshid Alam (AAG-12) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-04-2019 It is the petitioner's grievance that he has right, title and possession over the land appertaining to Khata No. 39, Keshra No. 38, admeasuring 57 decimal and Khata No. 17, Keshra No.61, admeasuring 63 decimal at Mauza Bahera, Thana Silao, District Nalanda, which he claims to have purchased against Jamabandi has been created. It is his case that private respondent No.9 is disturbing his peaceful possession over the land and preventing him, by use of force, from cultivating the
Patna High Court CWJC No.5992 of 2019(2) dt.01-04-2019 2/2 land. It is evident thus, that the disputes are between the petitioner and private respondent No.9.
It is the further grievance of the petitioner that despite the fact that he has approached the District Magistrate and the Superintendent of Police in this regard, no definite action has been taken.
Considering the nature of grievance which the petitioner has raised, this application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the Public Grievance Redressal Officer under Bihar Right to Public Grievance Redressal Act, 2015, which the petitioner is raising in the present proceeding. If any such application is made by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the Public Grievance Redressal Officer within the time prescribed under the Act, after giving due opportunity of hearing to respondent No.9.
This disposes of the application.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) arun/- U