Indran Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14235 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2020 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== Indran Chaudhary, S/o Late Nanhak Chaudhary, Resident of VillageMokarimchak, P.S.- Tekari, Distt- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Jitendra Narain Sinha, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-08-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State through Video Conferencing. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 23 of 2020, registered under Section 30(a)(C) of the Bihar Excise Act, 2016, pending in the court of Special Judge, Excise, Gaya.
The accusation is that in course of patrolling duty, raid was made in several houses in village Mokarimchak. In that course, 10 plastic containers each containing 14 litres Mahula solution meant for preparing the illicit liquor, Gas cylinder and two aluminum utensils were recovered from the house of petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14235 of 2020(2) dt.13-08-2020 2/2 petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case showing the recovery of 140 litres Mahua Solution from the house of the petitioner. Further submission is that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and recovery of 10 plastic containers each containing 14 litres Mahula solution meant for preparing the illicit liquor, Gas cylinder and two aluminum utensils from the house of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court within four weeks and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T