Dr. Satyendra Kumar Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3463 of 2015 ===========================================================
1. Dr. Satyendra Kumar Singh Son of Sudeshwar Singh Resident of Village Karkat Bigha, P.O. Ranipur, Via- Paliganj, District-Patna
2. Dr. Dinesh Kumar Tiwari, Son Of Vijendra Nath Tiwari, Resident of Sarvodya Printing Press, Rajendra of Sarvodya Printing Press, Rajendra Path, Jahaji Kothi, P.O & P.S. Kadam Kuan, Patna 3
3. Dr. Keshav Prasad Singh Son of Kishori Sharan Singh, Resident of Village Bhaluahi, P.O & P.S Sheohar, District Sheohar. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
2. The Director, Deshi Chikitsa, Health Department, Bihar, Patna.
3. The Special Secretary of Government of Bihar, Health Department, Bihar, Patna.
4. The Secretary, Central Council of Indian Medicine 61-65 Institutional Area. Janakpuri, New Delhi- 110058
5. The Executive Director, State Health Society Pariwar Kalyan Bhawan Sheikhpura, Patna 14, Bihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar For the State : Mr. AAG15- Yogendra Pd. Sinha For Respondent no.5 : Mr K.K.Sinha Mr Ajit Kumar =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 13-05-2015 Enough relaxation even for age has been granted by the respondents in matter of appointment of Aayush doctors. When the maximum age fixed by the Government for general category is only 37 years, the respondents have relaxed the age to 45 years across the board for one and all. In the interest of service and even otherwise of administration, such concessions are not required to be extended any further because there will be a situation where some people
Patna High Court CWJC No.3463 of 2015 dt.13-05-2015 2/2 will continue to be overage and claimants will always be available even if the age is extended to the age of superannuation. The relief prayed for in the present writ application, therefore, for giving any further indulgence in this regard is misplaced. Writ is dismissed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk U