Amit Raj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16540 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-328 Year-2025 Thana- PIRBAHOR District- Patna ====================================================== Amit Raj S/o Rajesh Sahni R/o - Durukhi Gali, Darji Tola, Sabzibagh, P.S - Pirbahore, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Madan Mohan For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Pronoti Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-04-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110, 351(2), 352 of the B.N.S.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a young boy aged about 19 years and the informant alleges that he requested for a carry bag from the shop owner i.e. the petitioner, on which petitioner got enraged and assaulted him by rod causing injury on head.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that informant was demanding a

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16540 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026 2/3 carry bag on which petitioner said that the same is for Rs.5/-, on which an altercation took place in which both sides assaulted each other. It is further submitted that petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the informant by rod causing injury on head, but then, the injury has been opined to be simple in nature as would manifest from Annexure- P/3. It is also submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting, then it is the first offence of the petitioner, the blow was not repeated and petitioner is a young boy and if he sent to judicial custody, his entire career would get jeopardized and chances are bright that he may come in contact with hardened criminals.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Pirbahore P. S. Case No.328 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16540 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026 3/3 Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father, Rajesh Sahni.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T