Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39584/2017bail granted

Randhir Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-08-19Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39584 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -189 Year- 2017 Thana -DANAPUR District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Randhir Kumar

2. Rahul Kumar, both sons of Ram Naresh Rai @ Naresh Rai, resident of Mohalla Bibiganj, Maida Tola, P.S. Danapur, District Patna .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ Manu For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

This is an application for bail in connection with Danapur P.S.Case No. 189 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioners is under Section 498A IPC.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners, who are brothers-in-law (Bhaisur and Dewar) and they are in custody since 14.7.2017.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, named above, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39584 of 2017 (2) dt.19-08-2017 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, in connection with Danapur P.S.Case No. 189 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U