Samir Kumar @ Samir Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26727 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2018 Thana- BEN P.S. District- Nalanda ====================================================== SAMIR KUMAR @ SAMIR SINGH S/o- RAJA RAM SINGH Resident of Village- Kamal Bigha, P.S.- Rajgir, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ram Tujabh Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Mukeshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-01-2022 Due to the third wave of COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of Virtual Court proceeding. The matter has been listed under the heading 'For Orders' under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ben P.S. case No.109/2018 registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
Prosecution case, in short, is that some unknown persons looted the motorcycle of the informant.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26727 of 2021(2) dt.17-01-2022 2/3 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. As per the prosecution case, some unknown persons are said to have looted the motorcycle of the informant. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the disclosure made by co-accused. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. There is no recovery of any looted article from the possession of the petitioner. Other co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Annexure 2 to the present application.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the complaint case/F.I.R. It is necessary to indicate here that this Court while considering the prayer made in the present anticipatory bail application has taken note of the exponential rise in number of covid cases due to outbreak of third wave of Covid-19 pandemic. Further this Court can also not lose sight of the fact that the condition of jails is not conducive and suitable to the present situation which has arisen due to the sudden rise in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26727 of 2021(2) dt.17-01-2022 3/3 covid cases.
Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. VI, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Ben P.S. case No.109/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T