Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34062/2018dismissed

Ramdeo Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2018-06-25Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 34062 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2018 Thana- Bhagwanpur District- Begusarai ====================================================== Ramdeo Singh, S/o Late Kapildeo Singh, R/o Village Mukhtiyarpur, P.S. Bhagwanpur in the district of Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Akhileshwar Pd. Singh Mr. Bimal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Smt Indu Kumari Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2.

25-06-2018 Heard Sri Akhileshwar Prasad Singh, learned senior counsel assisted by Sri Bimal Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. The sole petitioner, who is in custody in Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 34 of 2018 registered for offence under Sections 448, 504, 506, 385, 387, 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959, has prayed for grant of bail. By way of referring to F.I.R., it was argued by learned senior counsel for the petitioner that save and except allegation that petitioner has given order, there is no other specific overt act against the petitioner and as such, petitioner is entitled to be released on bail.

However, after going through the F.I.R., it is evident

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34062 of 2018(2) dt.25-06-2018 2/2 that firstly this petitioner alongwith others had reached to the door of the informant and threatened him to withdraw the case and also demanded ransom, which was informed by the informant to the police and police arrived. When police left, again this petitioner with others arrived at the house of the informant and he gave order, in which, indiscriminate firing was given and informant received one fire-arm injury on chest and two in thigh. Subsequently, he died. Meaning thereby that the case is based on the disclosure made by the deceased. Considering the fact that there is specific accusation against the petitioner, there is no reason to grant bail to the petitioner.

The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) anay U T