← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21917/2024dismissed

Parimal Rajhans v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-04Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21917 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2023 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Parimal Rajhans Son of Late Binod Kumar R/o Mohalla - Purani Adalat, Parwe Ke Paas, Mirganj, P.S.- Ara Town, District - Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajendra Nath Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 04-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Complaint Case No. 77 (O)/23 registered for the offences punishable under Section 23 of the P.C. and P.N.D.T. Act, 1994.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he was running an illegal ultrasound center.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the allegations of operating ultrasound center without registration or expert person is not true. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21917 of 2024(2) dt.04-04-2024 2/2 The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that considering the nature of the allegation the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seek regular bail, the learned Court below would pass order on the same day in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T