Patna High CourtCWJC/8970/2015disposed

Prabhat Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-03-08Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8970 of 2015 =================================================== Prabhat Kumar, Son of Sri Suresh Prasad, R/o Village+P.S. Govindpur, District Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner.

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

4. The District Magistrate, Nawada.

5. The District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority, Nawada through its Presiding Officer.

6. The District Education officer, Nawada.

7. The District Programme officer, Establishment, Nawada.

8. The Block Development Officer, Block, Govindpur, DistrictNawada.

9. The Block Education Officer, Block, Govindpur, District Nawada.

10. The Selection Committee of Panchayat Raj, Budhawara, P.S. Govindpur, District Nawada through its Mukhiya.

11. The Mukhiya, Panchayat Raj, Budhawara, P.s Govindpur, District Nawada.

12. The Panchayat Secretary, Panchayati Raj , Budhawara, P.S. Govindpur, District Nawada.

13. Sri Santosh Kumar, Son of Shri Shardha Prasad, Resident of Village- Nandlal Bigha, P.S. Akbarpur, District Nawada.

14. Sri Nand Kumar, Son of Shri Shardha Prasad resident of VillageNandlal Bigha, P.S. Akbarpur, District Nawada. .... .... Respondents.

=================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, Adv. For the Respondents: Mr. Satya Prakas, AC to SC-22. =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 08-03-2017 Heard parties.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8970 of 2015 dt.08-03-2017 In view of the limited prayer made at the time of hearing, without going into the merit of the case, this writ application is being disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the State appellate authority for redressal of his grievance. If the petitioner prefers an appeal within a period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, then let the same be considered and decided on its own merit and in accordance with law without touching the issue of limitation in view of the fact that this application has remained pending since the year 2015.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J.) Vikash/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 08.03.2017 Transmission Date NA