Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19583/2016dismissed

Ranvijay Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2016-05-19Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19583 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -5 Year- 2016 Thana -AMBA District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Ranvijay Singh Son of Nawal Singh

2. Nawal Singh son of Nawal Singh @ Dudeshwar Singh

3. Sachita Singh @ Sachchida Singh , son of Dudheshwar Singh

4. Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Singh son of Sachita Singh All resident of Village- Hariya, P.S.- Amba, District- Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhilesh Dutta Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.Rab(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-05-2016 Heard Sri N.K. Agrawal, learned senior counsel, who was assisted by Sri Akhlesh Dutt Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. M. Rab, learned A.P.P.

Four petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Amba P.S. Case No. 05 of 2016 registered for offence under section 147, 149, 323, 307 of the Indian Penal Code have prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

Learned senior counsel for the petitioners while pressing the petition submits that petitioner no. 2 and 3 are own brother of the informant whereas petitioner no. 1 and 4 are cousins. He submits that due to some property dispute false case has been instituted. He further submits that injuries which were

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19583 of 2016 (2) dt.19-05-2016 2/2 alleged were found simple in nature and as such he submits that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Mr. M. Rab, learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

I have perused the F.I.R. In the F.I.R. there is specific accusation against the petitioners. While rejecting the prayer for anticipatory bail learned Sessions Judge has noticed number of paragraphs of the case diary and also injury report. Of -course injuries were noticed as simple in nature but fact remains that the petitioners are named as accused in the F.I.R. and there is specific accusation against them. I do not find any ground for extending the privilege of anticipatory bail. The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U T