Patna High CourtC.R./180/2013withdrawn

Manoj Chaudhary And ORS. v. Birju Saw And ORS.

2016-04-19Mr. Justice V. Nath1 pages

Patna High Court C.R. No.180 of 2013 (2) dt.19-04-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Revision No.180 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Manoj Chaudhary Son Of Late Madan Choudhary Resident Of VillageBarhiya (English) New Chawani, P.O. And P.S.-Barhiya, DistrictLakhisarai.

2. Rajesh Chaudhary Son Of Late Madan Choudhary Resident Of VillageBarhiya (English) New Chawani, P.O. And P.S.-Barhiya, DistrictLakhisarai.

3. Mukesh Chaudhary Son Of Late Madan Chaudhary Resident Of VillageBarhiya (English) New Chawani, P.O. And P.S.-Barhiya, DistrictLakhisarai.

4. Daulti Devi Wife Of Santosh Chaudhary Resident Of Patna City, P.S.- Malsalami, District-Patna .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. Birju Saw Son Of Late Chulhi Saw Resident Of Village-Barhiya (English), P.S.-Barhiya, District-Lakhisarai

2. Karu Saw Son Of Late Chulhi Saw Resident Of Village-Barhiya (English), P.S.-Barhiya, District-Lakhisarai

3. Neelam Devi Daughter Of Late Chulhi Saw Resident Of Village-Barhiya (English), P.S.-Barhiya, District-Lakhisarai .... Opposite parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Onkar Nath For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 19-04-2016 Mr. Onkar Nath, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw this revision application by submitting that the matter has been settled between the parties by way of compromise.

Nobody has appeared on behalf of the Opposite parties. The prayer for withdrawal, as made on behalf of the petitioners, is allowed and this revision application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Snkumar/- (V. Nath, J) U