Pramod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14116 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2014 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== PRAMOD KUMAR Son of Sharan Bhuiyaan, Resident of Village - Azad Bigha, P.S.- Madanpur, Distt.- Aurangabad. (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Leelawati Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Matloob Rab ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 09-06-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State through Video Conferencing. In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No.133 of 2014 registered for offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 337, 353, 427, 504, 124A of the Indian Penal Code and section 17 of C.L.A. Act.
The petitioner has altogether two cases of identical nature. In the present case, allegation has been made that 500 people assembled to the police station with a view to snatch the arms. As the police could get a proper assistance, they informed the higher officer to protect the police station and thereafter, the police personnel reached there. After reaching the police personnel, the accused persons have resorted brick batting and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14116 of 2020(2) dt.09-06-2020 2/3 raised slogan against the police.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after lapse of four years, an application has been filed by the police for issuance of warrant of arrest and accordingly, the petitioner has been arrested on 20.11.2019. He further submits that the petitioner is a Teacher is performing in teaching the student. If such type of teacher is engaged for instigating the mob and creating crime, it is high time for the State to keep such type of teacher in the job.
Looking to the period of custody and another coaccused has already been granted bail by this Court as well as charge sheet has been submitted by the police, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad (Bihar) in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No.133 of 2014, subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a close relative. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. If the petitioner without any reasonable ground fails to appear
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14116 of 2020(2) dt.09-06-2020 3/3 before the court below on the date fixed, this order will be treated to have been withdrawn and the police will take the petitioner into custody.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T