Rajniti Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20506 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2025 Thana- Safiyasarai District- Munger ====================================================== Rajniti Yadav S/O Hari Prasad @ Harilal Yadav @ Hari Yadav Resident of Village- Prem Tola Farda, P.S- Safiasarai, Distt.- Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Suman Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ramesh Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Safiasarai P.S. Case No. 81 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 191(2), 193(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 132, 196, 109(1) and 285 of B.N.S. and Sections 30/27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that two groups of people of different communities started firing over each other. Police has arrested certain persons and others managed to escape.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. From perusal of the FIR, it is clear that the nature of allegation is general and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20506 of 2026(2) dt.15-04-2026 2/2 omnibus. It has further been submitted that from perusal of the seizure list, it will transpire that recovery has been made from coaccused Bablu. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. Similarly situated co-accused person has been granted bail by learned co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 7108 of 2026. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent.

5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Safiasarai P.S. Case No. 81 of 2025, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Munger subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of B.N.S.S.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T