Vikki Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17585 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-486 Year-2024 Thana- JAKKANPUR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Vikki Kumar son of Ravindra Sao Village- Lalganj Sehra PS- Paliganj, DistPatna P/A- Lali Singh ke makan me kirayedar, Old shiv Mandir Gali, Shekhpura, Opposite 70 No. Pillar Belly road, Ps- Hawai Adda, Dist- Patna 2.

Sonu Kumar son of Funnu Noniya village- Charra, Ps- Naubatpur, DistPatna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satrudhan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Jakkanpur P.S. Case No. 486 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 305 and 331(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, some unknown miscreants committed theft of one mobile phone along with cash of Rs. 10,000/- from the house of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17585 of35.36 cm 2025(2) dt.24-03-2025 2/3 present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner, rather the same is general and omnibus in nature. The petitioners are in custody since 13.11.2024. Petitioner no. 1 has got three criminal antecedents and petitioner no. 2 has got two criminal antecedents.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Let the petitioners be released on bail after framing of charge, if not already framed on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Jakkanpur P.S. Case No. 486 of 2024, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17585 of35.36 cm 2025(2) dt.24-03-2025 3/3 (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T