← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4652/2022disposed

M/S Bajrang Enterprises, v. The State Of Bihar,

2022-06-30Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh,Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4652 of 2022 ====================================================== M/s Bajrang Enterprises, represented through its proprietor namely Nirmal Kumar Jha, aged about 56 years, (M) Son of Sri Braham Dev Jha and the office of the said company is situated at Sonupur (Rosera) P.O. Sonupur and District - Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, through Commissioner Cum Secretary, The Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Circle, Darbhanga. 3.

The Executive Engineer, Public Health Division, Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Aditya Prakash Sahay, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Arvind Ujjwal, SC 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA) 30-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner has prayed for a writ in the nature of mandamus for directing the respondent authority to pay admitted dues of Rs. 51,63,189/- to the petitioner against the supply of materials and completion of work in time. According to him, he has made several representations to the authority but no matter fell on deaf ears.

The petition is, thus, disposed off with a direction that in case the petitioner files a fresh representation before the authority within three weeks from today, the same shall be

Patna High Court CWJC No.4652 of 2022(3) dt.30-06-2022 2/2 decided by the respondent no. 2 within one month thereof. In case, any amount is found due to the petitioner, it shall be released to him forthwith. In case, there is any inordinate delay, the State shall be at liberty to order recovery of the excess amount which had to be paid to the petitioner from the salary of the officer concerned.

The writ petition stands disposed off.

(Rajan Gupta, J) (Shailendra Singh, J) P. Kumar U