Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44880/2017bail granted

Rakesh Kumar Verma And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-15Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44880 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44880 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -122 Year- 2017 Thana -SIKTA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Rakesh Kumar Verma, S/o Braj Narayan Prasad, Resident of MohallaNew Colony, Baswariya.

2. Munna Kumar, S/o Chandradeo Raut, Resident of Mohalla- Emali Chawk, Baswariya, Both of P.S.- Bettiah Town, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioners/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajkishore Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Sikta P.S. Case No. 122 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 34 litres of Nepali Saufi liquor.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have falsely been implicated in this case and have no criminal antecedent and have been in judicial custody since 14.07.2017 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44880 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017 recovery and period of custody and also that petitioners has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Sikta P.S. Case No. 122 of 2017. (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioners again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T