← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19265/2024dismissed

Geetu Kumar @ Jeetu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-02Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19265 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-463 Year-2023 Thana- DEEPNAGAR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Geetu Kumar @ Jeetu Kumar Son Of Sri Niranjan Yadav R/O-Bijuranpur, P.S.-Deepnagar, Distt.-Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajiv Nayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 02-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Deepnagar P.S. Case No. 463 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 356, 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned C.J.M., Biharsharif at Nalanda.

3. Some miscreants are said to have snatched the bag containing mobile and charger of the informant. The apprehended co-accused named the petitioner as one of his fleeing accomplice.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case on the confessional statement of coaccused which is not admissible in the eye of law. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19265 of 2024(2) dt.02-04-2024 2/2 general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent of similar nature of the offence.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that considering the nature of the offence the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seek regular bail, the learned Court below would pass order on the same day in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T