Shyam Lal @ Shyam Lal Rishi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16660 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-189 Year-2021 Thana- JALALGARH District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.
SHYAM LAL @ SHYAM LAL RISHI SON OF LATE BHOTI RISHI @ BHOTAI RISHI R/O VILLAGE- MADHELI, P.S.- JALALGARH, DISTRICT- PURNEA 2.
NANDLAL RISHI SON OF LATE BHOTI RISHI @ BHOTAI RISHI R/O VILLAGE- MADHELI, P.S.- JALALGARH, DISTRICT-PURNEA ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dr. Bidhu Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 324, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent.
The informant alleges that on 04.12.2021, at about 11:00 a.m., while he was constructing a ridge on his land the petitioners came variously armed and started abusing him on which he protested then petitioner no. 2 assaulted the informant with farsa causing injury on his head and petitioner no. 1 pointed knife on the informant's neck. It is further alleged that thereafter the informant's mother and wife came to rescue,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16660 of 2022(2) dt.22-09-2022 2/2 they were also assaulted by the petitioners.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners and informant are agnates and there is a land dispute between them. It is further submitted that the date of occurrence is 04.12.2021 and the FIR was instituted on 11.12.2021 and from perusal of the impugned order, it would manifest that the injury suffered by the informant is simple in nature. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jalalgarh P.S. Case No. 189 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T