Mantu Singh @ Mantu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26624 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2020 Thana- SAHEBGANJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

MANTU SINGH @ MANTU KUMAR Son of Dinanath Singh Resident of Village- Madhopur, Hazari, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur. 2.

Ravindra Singh Son of Shiv Nath Singh Resident of Village- Madhopur, Hazari, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-03-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 208 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 447, 323, 379, 428, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per FIR, the accused persons entered into the house of the informant. They ransacked the entire house and also taken away valuable articles therefrom. It is further alleged that the accused persons assaulted the son of the informant due to which he sustained injuries.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26624 of 2021(2) dt.07-03-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The order of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IVth, Muzaffarpur itself shows that the injuries are grievous in nature and the petitioners have also criminal antecedents as mentioned in paragraph No. 25 and 26 of the case diary. As such, it is not a fit case for anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected.

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioners within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey , J) SONALI/- U T