← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15281/2019bail rejected

Ranjay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-25Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15281 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2018 Thana- BHAIRAVSHTHAN District- Madhubani ====================================================== RANJAY YADAV, Son of Shivdhari Yadav, Resident of Village-Olipur, P.SBhairabsthan, Dist.-Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Kumar No 13, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP Mr. Shivendra Lal Das, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 5/ 25-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State as well as counsel for the informant. Petitioner seeks bail in Bhairabasthan P.S. Case No.20 of 2018 (S.T. No.381 of 2018) instituted for the offence under Section(s) 302 and other allied sections of Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani.

In the written report, there is direct allegation against the petitioner of causing injury to Yogendra Yadav, husband of the informant with dagger on account of which he died. Learned APP has submitted that in the postmortem report doctor has found injury caused by sharp weapon in the lungs of the deceased and other injuries which corroborate the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15281 of 2019(5) dt.25-07-2019 2/2 allegation against the petitioner.

Therefore, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

Prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is rejected at this stage.

The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and make all efforts to conclude the same as early as possible, preferably, within a period of nine months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Liberty is given to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after nine months, if no substantive progress is made in the trial.

(Sanjay Priya, J) J. Alam/- U T