Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45210/2017bail granted

Raju Ray And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-15Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45210 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45210 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -552 Year- 2017 Thana -HAJIPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Raju Ray

2. Godhan Kumar @ Langara Both Sons of Late Munarik Ray, resident of Muhalla- Chaudhary Mubarak Ali, P.S.- Hajipur Town, District- Vaishali. .... .... Petitioners/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners/s : Mr. Vasant Vikas For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 552 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 188, 420 and 272 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30, 38, 47 and 48 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 23.8 litres of foreign liquor. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have falsely been implicated in this case and have no criminal antecedents and have been in judicial custody for more than a month.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45210 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017 recovery and period of custody and also that petitioners have no criminal antecedent, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge -II Cum Special Judge, Hajipur, in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 552 of 2017.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioners again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T