Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19518/2024dismissed

Manoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-05Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19518 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-56 Year-2023 Thana- KAJRAILI District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Manoj Yadav Son of Ramdeo Yadav Resident of village - Bari Goddi, P.S.- Kajraili, District - Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Swapnil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ramchandra Sahni ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This application for grant of regular bail arises out of Kajraili P.S. Case No.56 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under section 341, 323, 302, 307, 504 & 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, nine persons are said to have assaulted the deceased because of land dispute.

4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is case and counter case between the parties and one person from petitioners' side has also sustained grievous injury. It has also been submitted that a title suit is pending before the parties.

5. Learned APP opposes the prayer of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19518 of 2024(3) dt.05-07-2024 2/2 for bail.

6. I have considered the submissions of the parties.

7. In the postmortem report, nine injuries have come which supports the prosecution case of assault by accused persons. Further, the pendency of a land dispute will not give license to the petitioner and their family members to kill the deceased. The deceased was assaulted by the accused persons in a brutal manner.

8. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of regular bail.

9. Accordingly, this bail application is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U T