Rajendra Kumar v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6123 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.
Rajendra Kumar Son of Late Ram Janam Singh Resident of VillageHarpura, Mohammadpur, P.S.- Bikram, District- Patna. 2.
Madheshwar Singh @ Madhesh Singh Son of Late Musafir Singh Resident of Village- Harpura, Mohammadpur, P.S.- Bikram, District- Patna. 3.
Bacchu Singh Son of Raj Nath Singh Resident of Village- Harpura, Mohammadpur, P.S.- Bikram, District- Patna.
4.
Sajjan Dhari Singh Son of Late Janardan Singh Resident of VillageHarpura, Mohammadpur, P.S.- Bikram, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Pipelines Department through its Manager, E.R.P.L. Construction Office, Heera Niketan Kaliket Nagar, Bailey Road, Patna.
2.
Paradip- Haldiya- Durgapur LPG Pipeline Sambhardhan Paryojana through its Director, Indian oil corporation Heera Niketan Kaliket Nagar, Bailey Road, Patna.
3.
The Chief Construction Manager Paradip- Haldiya- Durgapur LPG Pipeline Sambhardhan Paryojana, Indian oil corporation Heera Niketan Kaliket Nagar, Bailey Road, Patna.
4.
The competent Authority Paradip- Haldiya- Durgapur LPG Pipeline (Sambardhan) Pipeline Project, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Heera Niketan Kaliket Nagar, Bailey Road, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6499 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.
Chunnu Kumar, Son of Parshuram Singh, Resident of Village- Dundo, P.O.- Dundo, P.S.- Jamui, District- Jamui.
2.
Ravindra Prasad Singh, Son of Late Rambalak Singh, Resident of VillageDundo, P.O.- Dundo, P.S.- Jamui, District- Jamui. 3.
Chandan Kumar, Son of Ajay Singh, Resident of Village- Dundo, P.O.- Dundo, P.S.- Jamui, District- Jamui.
4.
Shyamali Singh, Son of Late Prasidh Singh, Resident of Village- Dundo, P.O.- Dundo, P.S.- Jamui, District- Jamui.
5.
Vikash Kumar, Son of Shekhar Singh, Resident of Village- Dundo, P.O.- Dundo, P.S.- Jamui, District- Jamui.
6.
Sunil Singh, Son of Late Bhuneshwar Singh, Resident of Village and P.O. - Dundo, P.S.- Jamui, District- Jamui.
7.
Aatma Singh, Son of Late Rambalam Singh, Resident of Village and P.O. - Dundo, P.S.- Jamui, District- Jamui.
Patna High Court CWJC No.6123 of 2020(5) dt.01-08-2022 2/3 8.
Walmiki Singh, S/o late Prashid Singh, Resident of Village and P.O. - Dundo, P.S. Jamui, District- Jamui.
9.
Ranjan Kumar Singh, S/o Guru Prasad Singh, Resident of Village and P.O. - Dundo, P.S.- Jamui, District- Jamui.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union of India, through Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, New Delhi.
2.
The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Haldiya, Barauni, Pipeline Project, Barauni Construction Officer, B.K.P.L. Head Office Campus Barauni, Begusarai. 3.
The District Magistrate Cum Collector, Jamui. 4.
The D.C.L.R., Jamui.
5.
The Construction Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Construction Office, Barauni, District- Begusarai.
6.
The Circle Officer, Jamui.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6123 of 2020) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kanhaiya Pandey For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Uday Bhan Singh (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6499 of 2020) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Mukund Mohan Jha For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Sajid Salim Khan (Sc25) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-08-2022 Heard the parties.
A counter affidavit has been filed by the Indian Oil Limited (for short 'OIL'). Learned counsel for the petitioners has been served with the copy of the counter affidavit. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the OIL that payment has been made to the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits he has no instruction about the payments.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the State that
Patna High Court CWJC No.6123 of 2020(5) dt.01-08-2022 3/3 if the petitioners are aggrieved by the quantum of compensation then they have remedy of appeal before the District Judge concerned under the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962. In view of the above, this application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners that if the petitioners have any grievance, they may approach the appropriate authority in accordance with law.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U