Dinbandhu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15629 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2025 Thana- DESARI District- Vaishali ====================================================== Dinbandhu Singh S/O Late Rajdev Singh Resident of Village- Shahpur (Saifpur), Police Station- Ganga Bridge, Dist.- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjeet Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-07-2026 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137(1), 137(2) and 87 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that his daughter on 20-1-2025 at 5 PM had gone to the market for purchasing some articles, but did not return, thereafter on inquiry, it is submitted that Mukesh had kidnapped her, accordingly the informant went to the house of Mukesh where his father Dinbandhu (petitioner) said that he has no concern with Mukesh as he stays with his maternal grandparents, next alleges that the maternal grandparents of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15629 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026 2/3 Mukesh reside within the bounds of Bidupur PS and in the occurrence of kidnapping, Mukesh was helped by Vakil Ray, maternal uncle Subodh Rai and his Mami.

4.

The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Vakil Ray had approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc No. 42807 of 2025 and the same came to be allowed by an order dated 9-7-2025. It is next submitted that the case of the petitioner, if not akin, is similar to the case of Vakil Ray and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is father of Mukesh.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the order dated 9-7-2025 in Cr. Misc No. 42807 of 2025, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Desari (Chandpura OP) P.S. Case No. 31 of 2025, subject to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15629 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026 3/3 conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T